DAVID L. SHEPARD, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BEAIRD-POULAN, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
DAVID L. SHEPARD, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
BEAIRD-POULAN, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
638 F.2d 909
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1981)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In light of intervening decisions, including Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 5th Cir. 1981, 634 F. 2d 231, (En Banc Decision on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States); Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F. 2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) (On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States), the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether there exists a live controversy involving the proposed class; if so, whether Mr. Shepard is a proper class representative; if not, whether an appropriate class representative wishes to be appointed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simer v. Rios, 661 F.2d 655 (7th Cir. 1981)
-
White v. I.T.T., 718 F.2d 994 (11th Cir. 1983)
Authorities Cited
- Minda Satterwhite v. City OF Greenville, 634 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1981)
- Armour v. City OF Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980)
- Shepard v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc., 617 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1980)