GARY JOHN VAN OOTEGHEM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS APPELLANT,
v.
HARTSELL GRAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS TREASURER OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS (HENRY E. KRIEGEL, SUCCESSOR IN OFFICE), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS APPELLEE
GARY JOHN VAN OOTEGHEM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS APPELLANT,
HARTSELL GRAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS TREASURER OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS (HENRY E. KRIEGEL, SUCCESSOR IN OFFICE), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS APPELLEE
640 F.2d 12
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1981)
Caution
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. Taylor, 658 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
van Ooteghem v. Hartsell Gray, 654 F.2d 304 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
KIM v. Coppin State Coll., 662 F.2d 1055 (4th Cir. 1981)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence