CAMPANIELLO IMPORTS OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMIE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-04-23
No. 84-2195
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.
468 So. 2d 398 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Peppler v. Kasual Kreations, Inc., 416 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …s never issued prior to the commencement of the contempt proceeding as required by Rule 8.285(b), Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure. Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1977); May v. State, 623 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Naylor v. Naylor, 468 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Grant v. State, 464 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, the appellant shall be released from custody forthwith. Our reversal is without prejudice to the renewal of the contempt proceedings with appropriate notice as r…
  • FAY v. State, 608 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …ental error. Deter v. Deter, 353 So. 2d at 618; Starchk v. Wittenberg, 411 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). In addition, the trial court’s show cause order failed to allege the essential facts constituting the alleged contempt. See Naylor v. Naylor, 468 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Finally, the trial court failed to follow the requirements of rule 3.840(a)(6), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in that its order does not recite the acts of appellant which constitute the contempt. Reversed and remanded.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw