LEROY SHEFFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEROY SHEFFIELD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
468 So. 2d 441
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, since there appears to be some misapprehension on the subject, we wish to point out that appellant’s sentences which were imposed on September 20, 1984, were not under the sentencing guidelines because his crimes were committed prior to October 1, 1983, and he did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. See Heathcoat v. State, 463 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 458 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Affirmed.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Frazier v. State, 473 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…er the sentencing guidelines because his crime was committed on the evening immediately prior to October 1, 1983, the effective date of the guidelines, and he did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. See Sheffield v. State, 468 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). AFFIRMED. GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Rodriguez v. State, 458 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Heathcoat v. State, 463 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)