BILLY GUICE AND HOWARD CLAXTON, SR., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,
v.
RAY FORTENBERRY, SUPERINTENDENT EAST CARROLL PARISH PRISON FARM, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
BILLY GUICE AND HOWARD CLAXTON, SR., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,
RAY FORTENBERRY, SUPERINTENDENT EAST CARROLL PARISH PRISON FARM, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
642 F.2d 98
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pinter v. Dahl, 486 U.S. 622 (U.S. 1988)
-
Guice v. Fortenberry, 661 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
Eda Mae Page v. Barko Hydraulics, 673 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1982)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Guice v. Fortenberry, 633 F.2d 699 (5th Cir. 1980)