RAY COOLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
DUKE MCCALLISTER, JR., AND PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, INC., APPELLEES
RAY COOLEY, APPELLANT,
DUKE MCCALLISTER, JR., AND PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, INC., APPELLEES
468 So. 2d 488
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The issue of whether claimant was informed that he was released to light duty work was not raised before the deputy commissioner and, therefore, not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Troni-caría Products, Inc. v. Andrews, 461 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Otherwise, the deputy commissioner’s order is supported by competent, substantial evidence and is affirmed.
JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oakley v. E. Lake Drywall & Claims Ctr., 641 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…enefits as a statutory employee, pursuant to sections 440.02(13)(c) and 440.10(1), Florida Statutes, was not raised before the judge of compensation claims (JCC), and therefore not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Cooley v. McCallister, 468 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The JCC’s determination that the claimant was an independent contractor is supported by competent substantial evidence, and is affirmed. ERVIN, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. L.L. Wainwright, 461 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)