UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT HAMM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. WILLIS JUDGE BUTLER, LES WALLICK FULLER, DAYTON BUD EVANS, JR. AND LARRY DALE WASHINGTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
ROBERT HAMM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. WILLIS JUDGE BUTLER, LES WALLICK FULLER, DAYTON BUD EVANS, JR. AND LARRY DALE WASHINGTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
644 F.2d 354
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Other
(Opinion March 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 638 F. 2d 823)
Before BROWN, COLEMAN, AINS-WORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hamm, 659 F.2d 624 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
United States v. Hamm, 638 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1981)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Hamm, 638 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1981)