THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROLAND CLAUDE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-05-14
No. 84-902
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.
468 So. 2d 536 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Grayson, 90 So. 2d 710 (Fla.1956); Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Ostane v. Hickey, 385 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Herndon v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 530 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
    …So. 2d 479, 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (UM claim, court declared “validity and interpretation of the rights and obligations of parties to a contract are determined by the law of the place where the contract was made”); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Pierce, 468 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (where policies issued in North Carolina on autos registered and principally garaged there so that risk of policies was centered there rather than in Florida, where accident occurred, North Carolina law governed question of scope…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw