KENNETH BERNARD MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH BERNARD MOORE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
468 So. 2d 1036
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., specially concurs with opinion.
Concurrence
ANSTEAD, Chief Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur in my colleagues’ decision to uphold the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress because of the legal requirement imposed upon this reviewing court to uphold the trial court’s ruling where there exists competent substantial evidence in support thereof. That the trial court took a different view than the one which might seem most reasonable to us is not a valid basis for reversal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1593 v. Hillsborough Area Reg'l Transit, 139 So. 3d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…uires a showing that the statutory regulation employs the least intrusive means necessary to accomplish the legislative goal. Id. at 362. PERC grounded its ruling in this case on City of Hollywood v. Hollywood Municipal Employees AFSCME Local 2432, 468 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). See 39 F.P.E.R. 175. That decision interpreted section 447.403(4)(e), which addresses the steps to be taken “[fjollowing the resolution of the disputed impasse issues by the legislative body.” The City of Hollywood court remarke…