COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND RAYMOND WILLIAMS, WILLIE MCKAY, MARION J. EADDY, RANDOLPH HUGHES, JR., ARIEL BROWNLEE, WILLIAM BOSTIC, KENNETH HOWARD, ALPHA CHRISTMAS, RONALD RICHARDSON, CLARENCE WINDER, RONALD CRAWFORD, AND FRANK GILCHRIST, ON THEIR OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
v.
LOCAL UNION 542, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS; OPERATING ENGINEERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING COMMITTEE OF PHILADELPHIA, EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, AND THE STATE OF DELAWARE; GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, AND PENNSYLVANIA EXCAVATING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, ON THEIR OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND GLASGOW, INC., ON ITS OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, LOCAL UNION 542, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, APPELLANT IN NO. 80-2159. OPERATING ENGINEERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING COMMITTEE OF PHILADELPHIA, EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, AND THE STATE OF DELAWARE, APPELLANT IN NO. 80-2160

3d Cir. | 1981-05-19
Nos. 80-2159, 80-2160
Before WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, Judge, Court of Customs and Patent Appeals., Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, ALDISERT, GIBBONS, HUNTER, WEIS, and GARTH, Circuit Judges.
648 F.2d 922 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinions of the district court, see Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, 469 F.Supp. 329 (E.D.Pa.1978); 488 F.Supp. 988 (E.D.Pa.1979); 502 F.Supp. 7 (E.D.Pa.1979), and to the extent that the judgment of the district court is challenged by these appeals, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw