FRANKLIN B. BYSTROM, DADE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Counsel for the appellant conceded at oral argument that our affirmance of the judgment of the lower court in Bystrom v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc., 452 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) is not an affirmance of the correctness of the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board’s reduction of the assessments on parcels two and three, but is instead an affirmance of the trial court’s decision not to further reduce such assessments, and that therefore the judgment of the lower court, as affirmed, cannot itself preclude the appraiser, on res judicata or other similar grounds, from maintaining his separate action to overturn the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board’s reduction of his assessments on these parcels. With that concession, the judgment entered pursuant to our mandate is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
MacIas v. State, 515 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1987)…the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State v. Macias, 481 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Because we find that the decision conflicts with Machín v. State, 213 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert denied, 221 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1968), and Wells v. State, 468 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), we have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The district court of appeal overturned the decision of a circuit court, which had in its appellate capacity reversed the petitioner’s criminal convictions because she had been…
-
State v. MacIas, 481 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)…g gait to the jury he would be subject to cross-examination because the running gait would be a form of testimony where witnesses had testified that the person who committed the crime ran with a limp. The third district also found in Wells v. State, 468 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), based on Machín, that displaying tatoos would be testimonial. We respectfully disagree with the results in those cases. Both a running gait and tatoos are identifiable physical characteristics which are by nature non-communicativ…
-
Bystrom v. Fla. Rock Indus., Inc., 502 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…ind it to be without merit. Affirmed. .These assessments were upheld against an earlier challenge by Florida Rock that they were not reduced enough. Bystrom v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc., 452 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), aff'd after mandate, 468 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). . Subsequent to the initiation of this action, in Chapter 83-204, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature for the first time imposed a thirty day requirement upon an appraiser’s filing of challenge suits and certifications.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Vazquez v. Vazquez, 452 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)