THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

C.S., A JUVENILE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• R.R. v. State, 476 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …d. . Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971). . The exceptions to this rule are few and far between. E.g., Harris v. State, 438 So. 2d 787 (Fla.1983)(reference to invocation of fifth amendment per se error when preserved); Grissom v. State, 469 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(same; question certified). . Although we find the error harmless by any standard, including that of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,” we studiedly do not include that determination in the body of our opinion because, apparently unlike…
• State v. Grissom, 492 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 1986)
  …03 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983), receded from the per se rule of reversal explicated in Harris v. State, 438 So. 2d 787 (Fla.1983), David v. State, 369 So. 2d 943 (Fla.1979), and Trafficante v. State, 92 So. 2d 811 (Fla.1957)? Grissom v. State, 469 So. 2d 151, 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Grissom was charged with aggravated battery for intentionally pouring hot grease on his wife, causing severe burns. During the defense cross-examination of Mrs. Gris-som…
• Burns v. State, 466 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …t’s guilt,1 we are still bound by the per se reversal rule set forth in many cases, e.g., Donovan; Bennett; Rowell v. State, 450 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Turner; Peterson. As noted in Rowell and a recent case of this court, Grissom v. State, 469 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), the Florida Supreme Court in Murray did not expressly recede from the entrenched rule that any comment on the exercise by the accused of his right to remain silent is reversible error without regard to the harmless error doctrine…

Authorities Cited

• State v. C.C., 449 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
• Floyd v. Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 412 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
• State v. W. A. M., 412 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
• State v. R.F., 449 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)