TOM CAPPS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
VICTOR ATIYEH, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF OREGON; ROBERT J. WATSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF THE STATE OF OREGON; HOYT C. CUPP, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY; J. C. KEENEY, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF THE OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY; GEORGE E. SULLIVAN, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; BILL G. COGSWELL, IRA BLALOCK, ELIZABETH BROWN, CHALMERS L. JONES, AND HAZEL HAYES, MEMBERS OF THE OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; JOE WEST, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V. VICTOR ATIYEH, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF OREGON; ROBERT J. WATSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF OREGON; HOYT C. CUPP, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY; GEORGE E. SULLIVAN, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; BILL G. COGSWELL, IRA BLALOCK, ELIZABETH BROWNE, CHALMERS L. JONES, AND HAZEL HAYES, MEMBERS OF THE OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
TOM CAPPS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
VICTOR ATIYEH, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF OREGON; ROBERT J. WATSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF THE STATE OF OREGON; HOYT C. CUPP, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY; J. C. KEENEY, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF THE OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY; GEORGE E. SULLIVAN, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; BILL G. COGSWELL, IRA BLALOCK, ELIZABETH BROWN, CHALMERS L. JONES, AND HAZEL HAYES, MEMBERS OF THE OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; JOE WEST, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V. VICTOR ATIYEH, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF OREGON; ROBERT J. WATSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF OREGON; HOYT C. CUPP, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY; GEORGE E. SULLIVAN, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; BILL G. COGSWELL, IRA BLALOCK, ELIZABETH BROWNE, CHALMERS L. JONES, AND HAZEL HAYES, MEMBERS OF THE OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
652 F.2d 823
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1981)
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The case is ordered submitted. The district court’s judgment is vacated. See Capps v. Atiyeh, 495 F.Supp. 802 (D.Ore. 1980), stayed, Atiyeh v. Capps, 449 U.S. 1312, 101 S.Ct. 829, 66 L.Ed.2d 785 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice, 1981). The case is remanded for further consideration and specific findings in light of Rhodes v. Chapman, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981) and Wright v. Rushen, 642 F. 2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1981).
Appellants’ motion to submit supplemental briefs is denied.
JUDGMENT VACATED and CASE REMANDED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813 (9th Cir. 1982)
-
Parks v. Watson, 716 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1983)
-
Foremost PRO Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 703 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (U.S. 1981)
- Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1981)
- Atiyeh v. Capps, 449 U.S. 1312 (U.S. 1981)