STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. HARRY C. DAVIS, RELATOR,
v.
A. J. RYAN, THOMAS E. SWANSON, JOHN B. SHERWIN AND FLOYD WRAY, AS AND CONSTITUTING BROWARD COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied a petition for intervention by taxpayers seeking to resist a writ of prohibition. The court allowed the relator ten days to file briefs on the demurrer and motion to quash, after which the case would be considered on its merits.
The petition for intervention was denied without prejudice. The relator was granted ten days to file briefs on the demurrer and motion to quash, after which the case would be considered on its merits.
“This cause coming on to be heard upon the petition of Thomas E. Swanson and others as taxpayers of Broward County Port District for leave to intervene in this cause and to resist the granting of a Peremptory Writ of Prohibition herein and same having been duly considered by the Court after argument of counsel for the respective parties, it is ordered by the Court that the said petition for intervention be and the same is hereby denied without prejudice”
This quote establishes the court's action regarding the petition for intervention.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTaxpayers of Broward County Port District petitioned for leave to intervene in a case to resist a Peremptory Writ of Prohibition. The court considered…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition To Intervene cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause coming on to be heard upon the petition of Thomas E. Swanson and others as taxpayers of Broward County Port District for leave to intervene in this cause and to resist the granting of a Peremptory Writ of Prohibition herein and same having been duly considered by the Court after argument of counsel for the respective parties, it is ordered by the Court that the said petition for intervention be and the same is hereby denied without prejudice and that counsel for relator is hereby allowed ten days from this date in which to file briefs upon the demurrer to the Alternative Writ and upon the motion to quash the Alternative Writ heretofore filed in this cause and that upon the filing of such briefs the cause will be taken up for consideration on the merits as presented by these pleadings without further oral argument.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Foster v. Thornton, 131 Fla. 277 (Fla. 1937)…ustee? In support of the question, as propounded by counsel for appellants, is cited Glidden, Admr., v. Gutelius, 96 Fla. 834, 119 So. 140; Myers, Receiver, v. Matusek, 98 Fla. 1126, 125 So. 360; First Trust & Savings Bk. v. Therrell, as Liquidator, 103 Fla. 1136, 138 So. 733, with many citations of authorities from other jurisdictions. We have examined each of these authorities and are in full accord therewith. The question propounded by coun [*298] sel for appellants assumes that the lands were bought wit…
-
Kent v. Kent, 431 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…of a trust may pursue trust funds which have been wrongfully diverted, provided their identity has not been lost and they have not passed into the hands of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. First State Trust & Savings Bank v. Therrell, 103 Fla. 1136, 138 So. 733 (1932). See also Smith v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co., 116 Fla. 390, 156 So. 498 (1934); Standard Oil Co. v. Mehrtens, 96 Fla. 455, 118 So. 216 (1928). In Smith, the court noted that a purchaser with knowledge of the facts giving…
-
City of Fort Lauderdale v. State, 125 Fla. 89 (Fla. 1936)…story of such litigation and the statutory references incident to its determination see the following decisions and statutes: Martha Bright Farms, Inc., v. Broward County Port Authority, 117 Fla. 361, 158 Sou. Rep. 70; State, ex rel. Davis, v. Hyan, 103 Fla. 1136, 151 Sou. Rep. 416; State, ex rel. Ake, v. Broward County Port Authority, 107 Fla. 303, 151 Sou. Rep. 718, Chapter 12552, Special Acts of 1927; Chapters 13940 and 13941, Special Acts of 1929; Chapter 15107, Special Acts of 1931; Chapters 17506 and 1…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence