MICHAEL E. SPIESS, JACK K. HARDY AND BENJAMIN F. ROUNTREE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
C. ITOH & COMPANY (AMERICA) INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
MICHAEL E. SPIESS, JACK K. HARDY AND BENJAMIN F. ROUNTREE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
C. ITOH & COMPANY (AMERICA) INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
654 F.2d 302
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1981)
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Administrative Unit of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Administrative Unit in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Administrative Unit of the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hayes Williams and Arthur Mitchell v. Treen, 671 F.2d 892 (5th Cir. 1982)
-
Pettibone v. Hoyt C. Cupp, 666 F.2d 333 (9th Cir. 1981)
-
Briggs v. Lucas, 678 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1982)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence