MICHAEL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
469 So. 2d 917
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1985)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 28 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not err in summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant failed to allege a facially sufficient ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Downs v. State, 453 So. 2d 1102 (Fla.1984). The two remaining grounds which appellant alleged as a basis for relief were already raised on appeal and cannot be used for a rule 3.850 collateral attack. Jones v. State, 446 So. 2d 1059, 1061-62 (Fla.1984).
Affirmed.
RYDER, C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (26 total)
-
Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 2004)…’) is essential to a determination of whether challenges for cause or peremptory challenges are to be made, it is well settled that the scope of the voir dire properly includes questions about and references to that legal doctrine.” Lavado v. State, 469 So. 2d 917, 919-20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (Pearson, J., dissenting). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) provides in pertinent part that “[ejxcept in capital cases, the judge shall not instruct the jury on the sentence that may be imposed for the offense…
-
Lavado v. State, 492 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1986)…BARKETT, Justice. We have for review Lavado v. State, 469 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), because it directly and expressly conflicts with Pope v. State, 84 Fla. 428, 94 So. 865 (1922), Pait v. State, 112 So. 2d 380 (Fla.1959), and Washington v. State, 371 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We have jurisdiction. Art. V,…
-
Franqui v. State (Fla. 1997)…ecutor explained legal doctrine of criminal z*esponsibility of aiders and abettors to prospective jurara and then asked them if they would render a verdict of guilty of all necessary elements for conviction under doctrine present). Lavado v. State, 469 So. 2d 917, 919-20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Judge Pearson also noted the importance of “the nature and purpose of the question” in each case, and indicated that asking whether jurors would acquit based on hypothetical testimony rather than asking jurors about their…
Previewing 3 of 26 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Downs v. State, 453 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 1984)
- Jones v. State, 446 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1984)