NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE REEF CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hood v. Louie Franklin Hood, 535 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …rty. The trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven year payment period, especially in light of the husband’s financial affidavit reflecting net assets of over $117,000 and a weekly income of over $1,100. Urbieta v. Urbieta, 469 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Under these circumstances, we think that a payment period should not exceed two years, and that it should provide for interest at a reasonable rate from the date of dissolution. Accordingly, we reverse the payment period with dir…
• Bleakley v. Bleakley, 680 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …the husband’s required monthly payment towards the wife’s attorney fees. The prescribed payment amount is too low as it does not cover even the monthly interest on the principal amount and the husband has the ability to pay more. Urbieta v. Urbieta, 469 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), found an abuse of discretion where the court assigned a monthly payment too low in proportion to the assets and income of the husband. The same situation exists here. We remand the monthly fee payment issue to the trial court f…
• R.M.A. v. J.A.S., 269 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
  …("The trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven[-]year payment period, especially in light of the husband's financial affidavit reflecting net assets of over $117,000 and a weekly income of over $1,100."); Urbieta v. Urbieta, 469 So. 2d 930, 931 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (finding that the fifty-dollar monthly repayment "was manifestly erroneous in face of the husband's financial affidavits reflecting assets of $391,000" as it would take the husband eight years to repay the remaining $4800 awa…

Authorities Cited

• Chotka v. Fidelco Growth Invs., 383 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)