PHILLIP KANE, APPELLANT,

v.

SHIRLEY KANE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Carroll v. Carroll, 471 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …n attorney’s fees. In light of our remand to distribute equitably the marital assets, the trial court must consider anew the wife’s entitlement to attorney’s fees. Here, too, the principles of Canakaris shall provide guidance. See also Kane v. Kane, 469 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (husband should pay wife’s attorney’s fees in view of his superior financial position), and cases cited therein; Angelides v. Angelides, 466 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (trial court grant of attorney’s fees to wife proper given…
• Werner v. Werner, 587 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …ancial ability, the court should have ordered him to pay her fees. Martinez-Cid v. Martinez-Cid, 559 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kuse v. Kuse, 533 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Pappas v. Pappas, 489 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Kane v. Kane, 469 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Angelides v. Angelides, 466 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). We therefore reverse that portion of the amended final judgment. As for the husband’s cross-appeal challenging the alimony award, we conclude that the trial court’s int…
• Heller v. Kuvin, 490 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …ourt abused its discretion in requiring that the husband pay only $8,000, rather than the entire $14,000, for the wife’s attorney’s fees. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d at 1205; Pappas v. Pappas, 489 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Kane v. Kane, 469 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Bryan v. Bryan, 442 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, 450 So. 2d 485 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to order the husband to pay $14,-000 for the wife’s attorney’s fees.3 We further co…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
• Booth v. The Travelers Ins. Co., 452 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
• Hirst v. Hirst, 452 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
• Jacobs v. Jacobs, 429 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)