IRENE GIOKAS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Consultants & Designers & Cigna Cos. v. Brown, 677 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …n to dismiss simply because of fortuity that order also quashed service of process; fact that order rules on an issue that is subject to interlocutory appeal does not permit rulings made in same order on other issues to “tag along”); Supal v. Pelot, 469 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (defendants may not appeal denial of motion to dismiss for lack of standing simply because ruling was made in same order that granted plaintiffs’ request for temporary injunction); Chesler v. Hendler, 428 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA…
• Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. Timeshares Direct, Inc., 123 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
  …f the summary final judgment that dismissed Wyndham’s claim for FDUTPA damages. See Suggs v. Sw. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 953 So. 2d 699, 700 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Faulk v. Air Prods. & Chems., Inc., 798 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Supal v. Pelot, 469 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). The procedural limitations imposed by the rules do not permit review of “tag along” orders contained within reviewable non-final orders. See Chester v. Hendler, 428 So. 2d 730, 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) ("Nor does the fact that th…
• Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. EBY, M.D., P.A., 916 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
  …enial of a motion to dismiss a complaint is a nonfinal order, and the denial of a motion to dismiss for failure to name indispensable parties or for lack of standing is not listed as an appealable nonfinal order in rule 9.130(a). See Supal v. Pelot, 469 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (recognizing that an order denying a motion to dismiss based on a lack of standing is not an appealable nonfinal order). Certiorari review may be available in limited circumstances with regard to nonfinal orders, Reeves v. Fleet…

Authorities Cited

• Hendrix v. State, 455 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)