MULTISTATE TAX COMMISSION, EUGENE F. CORRIGAN, ET AL., PETITIONERS/CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court's order compelling production of documents for audit should be modified to allow for in camera inspection of disputed materials and that MTC may apply for copies after final inspection.
The Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) sought to compel United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel) to produce documents for an audit. The district cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Proprietary Information cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is an action by the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) seeking an order compelling production of documents for its audit of United States Steel Corporation. These appeals are from the district court’s order delineating the rights and duties of the parties.
The district court stayed its order pending this appeal, but conditioned the stay upon the filing by U.S. Steel of a 60-day waiver of the statute of limitations. Such a condition was not an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. In re Turner, 309 F. 2d 69, 72 (2d Cir. 1962); Foster v. United States, 265 F. 2d 183, 188-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 912, 79 S.Ct. 1297, 3 L.Ed.2d 1261 (1959); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c).
The district court did not consider any issues concerning the effectiveness of the waiver and the continued viability of the audit in the light of provisional assessments issued by some states. No such questions are properly before us.
The contested issues with respect to the substance of the order itself concern, first, the ruling that U.S. Steel should permit inspection of allegedly proprietary information, and second, the prohibition against MTC’s copying U.S. Steel documents. The first issue could well have been avoided by an in camera inspection by the district court to determine whether the documents in question do in fact contain information which should not be disclosed. We conclude that such an inspection would still be helpful in the circumstances. The district court’s order should be modified to provide for disclosure of the disputed materials subject to in camera inspection upon motion by U.S. Steel. With respect to copying, we believe that if, after MTC has completed its final inspection, it wishes to have copies of a reasonable number of documents, it may apply to the district court for an appropriate order. The district court’s order is affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber OF Commerce, Inc., 705 F.2d 1515 (9th Cir. 1983)
-
Multistate TAX Comm'n Eugene F. Corrigan v. United States Steel Corp., 714 F.2d 925 (9th Cir. 1983)
Authorities Cited
- Foster v. United States, 265 F.2d 183 (2d Cir. 1959)
- Webster Rosewood Corp. v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc., 360 U.S. 912 (U.S. 1959)
- Dornblut v. United States, 360 U.S. 912 (U.S. 1959)
- In re the Tax Liab. of Reuben Turner, 309 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1962)