CAROLE HYMAN BURSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
CAROLE HYMAN BURSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
668 F.2d 795
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 50 cases
Other
PER CURIAM:
The court has concluded that its consideration of this case would be benefited by oral argument. Accordingly, the panel opinion, 659 F. 2d 670, is withdrawn. The Clerk is instructed to set the case on the oral argument calendar and to establish a supplemental briefing schedule addressing the arguments pertaining to the proper test of personal jurisdiction raised in the plaintiff-appellant’s petition for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (48 total)
-
Lincoln v. Bd. OF Regents OF THE Univ. Sys. OF Ga., 697 F.2d 928 (11th Cir. 1983)
-
Beard v. Whitley Cnty. Remc, 840 F.2d 405 (7th Cir. 1988)
-
Nilsen v. The City OF Moss Point, 701 F.2d 556 (5th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 48 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Burstein v. The State BAR OF Cal., 659 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1981)