LORENZO FARNELL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co., 515 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …. Gibbs, we accepted certiorari jurisdiction and quashed orders denying motions to dismiss in Home Insurance Company of Illinois v. Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company, 461 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) and Canadian Home Insurance Company v. Norris, 471 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). However, more recently in Doerschuck v. Doerschuck, 481 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), we reverted to the view expressed in Chalfonte and denied a petition for certiorari seeking review of an order denying a motion to dismiss.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Jenne v. Maranto, 825 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …use material injury to the petitioner throughout the remainder of the proceedings below, effectively leaving no adequate remedy on appeal”); Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); see also Canadian Home Ins. Co. v. Norris, 471 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (even though trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss was not subject to nonfinal appeal, court would review order by common-law certiorari where adequate relief could not be obtained on plenary appeal and where…
• Universal Sec. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Spreadbury, 524 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …llate relief from an order denying a motion to dismiss, the present matter marks an exception to the rule; we have jurisdiction. Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Moffett, 513 So. 2d 1345 [*1168] (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Canadian Home Insurance Co. v. Norris, 471 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). For the reasons stated below, we grant the petition, quash the trial court’s order, and remand with the direction that Universal Security’s motion to dismiss be granted. Spreadbury filed a personal injury action arising out of…