MARTIN FRANCIS MCGARRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed a defendant's 49-year sentence for bad check charges, which was entered in accordance with a plea agreement. The agreement stipulated a much harsher sentence if the defendant failed to appear for sentencing.
Yes, the plea agreement is enforceable. The court held that the defendant voluntarily agreed to the terms of the plea arrangement, which were lawful and explicitly stated.
[1] A defendant's voluntary agreement to a plea arrangement, which is lawful and explicitly agreed to, cannot be set aside by the court.
[2] A plea agreement that calls for a specific sentence upon the defendant's failure to appear at a sentencing hearing is enforceable.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We affirm appellant’s sentence of consecutive terms totalling 49 years entered in strict accord with a plea agreement as to numerous bad check charges.”
States the court's decision to affirm the sentence.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant McGarry agreed to a plea deal for numerous bad check charges. The agreement stipulated a maximum sentence of 3 years if he appeared for sent…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Agreement cases and more on FLexlaw
ANSTEAD, Chief Judge.
We affirm appellant’s sentence of consecutive terms totalling 49 years entered in strict accord with a plea agreement as to numerous bad check charges.
Under the plea agreement, had appellant appeared for his initial sentencing hearing, the maximum sentence he would have received was 3 years. We must confess that we are concerned that the state, the appellant, and especially the trial court would all agree with a plea arrangement that resulted in the appellant’s receiving additional consecutive sentences of some 46 years because he failed to appear at the hearing. Appellant now points out, for the first time, that his failure to appear for a hearing would ordinarily be punishable by a maximum of 5 years. See § 843.15, Fla. Stat. (1983).
Hence, according to appellant, he should have received 3 years plus 5 for not showing up, or a total of 8 years, instead of the 49 years provided for in the plea agreement. We cannot agree.
The record is abundantly clear and explicit in reflecting appellant’s voluntary agreement to a plea arrangement that called for the very sentence eventually imposed if he did not appear for sentencing. Davis v. State, 308 So. 2d 27 (Fla.1975). We cannot cavalierly set aside such a plea agreement which was fully within the law and clearly agreed to by appellant. It is undisputed that appellant’s failure to appear was a result of his willful action to avoid imprisonment and that the sentences imposed were lawful.
Notwithstanding our affirmance, we would hope that counsel will not recommend and that trial courts will be reluctant to approve such plea arrangements in the future. While a defendant certainly deserves to be penalized for not appearing, as section 843.15 provides, an extra 46 years seems a bit much, especially at a time when the state’s justice system is making a concerted effort to improve the sentencing process. Our affirmance is, of course, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief.
HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vera v. State, 481 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of McGarry v. State, 471 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). ANSTEAD, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Vikki Zimmerman Davis v. State, 308 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1975)