JAMES CHANG, PETITIONER,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, AND UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENTS
JAMES CHANG, PETITIONER,
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, AND UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENTS
677 F.2d 173
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1982)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F. 2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981) and Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F. 2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving both claims of discrimination and of improper agency action must be brought as one action in the district court. Accordingly we lack jurisdiction over the petition and it is therefore dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. Dep't OF the Army, 715 F.2d 1485 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
-
Hayes v. United States Gov't Printing Off., 684 F.2d 137 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
-
Doyal v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wiggins v. The United States Postal Serv., 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981)
- Christo v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. & United States Postal Serv., 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981)