DAVID LEROY WASHINGTON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES E. STRICKLAND, SUPERINTENDENT; JIM SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA; LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
DAVID LEROY WASHINGTON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
CHARLES E. STRICKLAND, SUPERINTENDENT; JIM SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA; LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
679 F.2d 23
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)
-
Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879 (5th Cir. 1982)
-
Cepulonis v. Ponte, 699 F.2d 573 (1st Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879 (5th Cir. 1982)