KEITH W. LEWIS, APPELLANT,
v.
GLORIA V. LEWIS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-07-02
No. 84-2046
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BAS-KIN, JJ.
472 So. 2d 542 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a Pinal Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, the husband, Keith W. Lewis, challenges the trial court’s distribution of certain jointly held real property. Following remand in Lewis v. Lewis, 402 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), the trial court awarded the wife the husband’s equity interests in the marital residence and other jointly held property as lump sum alimony. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court was justified in awarding the wife lump sum alimony to achieve an equitable distribution of the jointly held property. Tronconi v. Tronconi, 466 So. 2d 203 (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Because the lump sum alimony award is within the bounds of reason, we find no abuse of discretion, and, accordingly, affirm. Walter v. Walter, 464 So. 2d 538 (Fla.1985); Canakaris.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Owsley v. Owsley, 510 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …though funded, as here, entirely by the husband from a salary bonus he earned during the course of the marriage. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1201 (Fla.1980); see also Robinson v. Robinson, 403 So. 2d 1306 (Fla.1980); Lewis v. Lewis, 472 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Second, the trial court did not abuse its discretion, as urged, in awarding the wife three years of rehabilitative alimony of $200 a week. Based on this record, the trial court could have reasonably concluded that Mr. Owsley co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw