L.B., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-07-02
No. 84-777
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
472 So. 2d 795 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See M.A.P. v. State, 403 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); State v. Spurling, 385 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 392 So. 2d 1379 (Fla.1980); Franklin v. State, 374 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.1980); State v. Stevens, 354 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tampa BAY Publ'ns, Inc. v. Watkins, 549 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
    …the discretion to do so. This statutory provision is also available to the successful employer when the trial court deems the circumstances are appropriate to impose costs on employees for frivolous claims. See Carpenter v. Metropolitan Dade County, 472 So. 2d 795, 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (trial court properly granted attorney’s fees under section 448.-08 to County as prevailing party where employee filed an action for back wages beyond the applicable statute of limitations period). Section 448.08 specificall…
  • …on appearing in the record, and the law of the case reason for affirmance is obvious from this record. See In re Yohn’s Estate, 238 So. 2d 290, 295 (Fla.1970); Green v. Bruns, 102 So. 2d 610, 612-13 (Fla.1958); Carpenter v. Metropolitan Dade County, 472 So. 2d 795, 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Florida Ins. Exchange v. State, 178 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). AFFIRMED. . But cf. Coudry v. City of Titusville, 438 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (appellate court affirming summary judgment for defendant may…
  • Ultimate Makeover Salon & SPA, Inc. v. DiFRANCESCO, 41 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    …ey’s fees to prevailing employers. Case law does support, however, awarding an employer attorney’s fees under section 448.08 when the employer prevails under a section 95.11(4)(c) statute of limitations defense. See Carpenter v. Metro. Dade County, 472 So. 2d 795, 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (“Although [the employee’s] complaint purported to seek a declaratory statement of his rights, his claim actually constituted an action for back wages filed beyond the applicable limitations period. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw