UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
RALPH T. MILLER AND JOAN MILLER, DEFENDANTS. IN RE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM OF JAMES M. RUSS, APPELLANT
PER CURIAM:
Before issuance of the mandate in the instant case, the parties have brought to the attention of the court facts which render the case moot.
The court notes that the pretrial subpoena duces tecum at issue in this case was relevant only to the pending criminal tax fraud proceedings against the Millers, that these criminal proceedings have now been finalized, and that the instant case has therefore become moot. Accordingly, the previous opinion of this court published at 660 F. 2d 563 (5th Cir. 1981), is vacated; the judgment of the district court holding appellant Russ in contempt is VACATED; and the case is REMANDED with instructions that the district court quash the subpoena and dismiss the case. United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tucker v. State, 484 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
-
In re Kave, 760 F.2d 343 (1st Cir. 1985)
-
United States v. Ghidoni, 732 F.2d 814 (11th Cir. 1984)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)
- United States v. Ralph T. Miller & Joan Miller, 660 F.2d 563 (5th Cir. 1981)