IMPERIAL BIRD COMPANY AND INA/AETNA INSURANCE CO., APPELLANTS,
v.
GALE BEYER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the value of birds provided to a claimant as compensation should be included in the calculation of her average weekly wage.
A claimant, in addition to cash wages, received birdseed and birds from her employer, a dealer in exotic birds. The deputy commissioner determined the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Calculation cases and more on FLexlaw
WENTWORTH, Judge.
Employer/carrier seek review of a workers’ compensation order by which claimant was awarded temporary partial disability benefits. We find that no point of reversible error has been presented for our review and we therefore affirm the order appealed.
Claimant worked for a dealer in exotic birds, and in addition to her cash wages was provided with birdseed and various birds. The deputy commissioner concluded that the birds were furnished as additional compensation for extra work which claimant performed, and we find that the record provides evidentiary support for this determination. The value of the birds was thus properly included in the computation of claimant’s average weekly wage, in accordance with § 440.02(12), Florida Statutes.
Arguing that birds are not personal necessities, employer/carrier contend that they are not encompassed within § 440.-02(12), which defines “wages” as:
... the money rate at which the service rendered is recompensed under the contract of hiring in force at the time of the injury, including the reasonable value of board, rent, housing, lodging, or similar advantage....
However, we do not construe this statutory language as imposing an absolute categorical limitation with regard to non-cash payments, since § 440.02(12) further provides that:
In employment in which an employee receives consideration other than cash as a. portion of this compensation, the value of such compensation shall be subject to the determination of the deputy commissioner. In the present case the birds were received as “consideration other than cash” and were thus subject to valuation by the deputy commissioner and properly included in computing claimant’s average weekly wage.
The order appealed is affirmed.
NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Delong v. 3015 W. Corp. & Rockwood Ins. Co., 491 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…he employer to send them back to the wholesaler. On that basis alone, the materials would not be encompassed within the statutory definition of “wages” found in section 440.02(21), Florida Statutes (1985). See Imperial Bird Company and INA v. Beyer, 472 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). We reverse, however, the deputy commissioner’s denial of authorization for attendant care services. The general rule is that shopping, cooking, and other household services performed by a spouse or other family member are consi…
-
Bell Brokerage Co. v. Quintero, 556 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…claimant as consideration for services performed on behalf of the employer in order to qualify as “wages” under Section 440.02(21), Florida Statutes (1987). Delong v. 3015 West Corp., 491 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Imperial Bird Co. v. Beyer, 472 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In this case, as in Delong, no wage-type value could be assigned the materials. The claimant could not have used his own funds to purchase the damaged food items, because many of them, if not all, could not be legally sold. Mo…
-
Univ. OF Miami Med. Sch. & Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Singleton, 582 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…Stat. (TTD based on percentage of AWW); § 440.02(23) (“wages” means money rate and any other consideration given for service rendered); [*1183] Delong v. 3015 West Corp., 491 So. 2d 1306, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Imperial Bird Co. and INA v. Beyer, 472 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In the instant case, the judge erred in his calculation of monthly earnings. Claimant received a $9,000-per-year stipend and free tuition for being a graduate student in the Department of Biochemistry. However, the lump-sum awa…