JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
OSWEGO PETROLEUM CARRIERS, INC. AND MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, INC., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jacksonville Shipyards appealed a trial court judgment on remand following a previous appellate decision (JSI I) that had awarded attorney's fees. The court held that while the trial court properly limited attorney's fees to defense of the indemnity action (excluding prosecution costs), it erred by failing to assess the amount of appellate attorney's fees previously ordered and should assess fees for both the prior and current appeals.
The court held that the trial court properly limited attorney's fees to appellant's defense of the indemnity action (affirmed), but erred in failing to assess the amount of appellate attorney's fees previously ordered in JSI I and failed to assess attorney's fees for the current appeal, requiring remand for proper assessment of both amounts.
[1] A trial court may award attorney's fees and costs only for the defense of an indemnified matter, not for the prosecution of the indemnity action itself.
[2] A trial court must assess the amount of appellate attorney's fees when ordered to do so by an appellate court.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Upon remand the trial court properly determined that appellant was entitled to attorney's fees and costs only for appellant-indemnitee's defense of the matter indemnified against.”
Establishes the correct legal standard that fees are limited to defense of the indemnity action, not prosecution
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJacksonville Shipyards defended an indemnity action and prevailed in the original trial court. On first appeal (JSI I), the court affirmed the lower c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appeal From Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, Judge.
Jacksonville Shipyards appeals a final judgment entered by the trial court following remand after a previous appeal. Jacksonville Shipyards Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc., 443 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (“JSI I”). Appellant argues that the trial court erred upon remand in failing to assess and award the appellate attorney’s fees granted by this court in the prior appeal, and in awarding attorney’s fees and costs only for appellant’s defense of the indemnity action. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
In JSI I this court affirmed the lower court’s decision in the original action, but held that the court should have awarded attorney’s fees for the lower court proceeding. In JSI I, appellant also filed a petition for attorney’s fees in connection with that appeal. This petition was granted, and the trial court was ordered to assess the amount.
Upon remand the trial court properly determined that appellant was entitled to attorney’s fees and costs only for appellant-indemnitee’s defense of the matter indemnified against. The trial court determined that appellant was not entitled to recover attorney’s fees and costs for its prosecution of the indemnity action itself. See American and Foreign Insurance Co. v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 401 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Therefore, the portion of the final judgment assessing and awarding attorney’s fees and costs for the lower court proceedings is affirmed.
The trial court neglected, however, to assess the amount of appellate attorney’s fees as ordered by this court pursuant to appellant’s motion in JSI I. This was error. It should also be noted that appellant has filed another motion for attorney’s fees in conjunction with this appeal. As in JSI I, the motion is granted and the case is remanded to the trial court to assess the amount of the fee. Both the prior appeal and this appeal involved attorney’s fees due for the defense of the indemnity action.
Accordingly, the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs for appellant’s defense of the indemnity action only, and not for prosecution of the indemnity action, is affirmed. Because of the trial court’s failure to properly assess the amount of appellate attorney’s fees ordered in JSI I the case is remanded. Upon remand the trial court shall have two attorney’s fee amount determinations before it: it must assess the amount of attorney’s fees due appellant in connection with the appeal in JSI I, and it must assess the amount of attorney’s fees in connection with this appeal.1
Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
MILLS and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur. . Appellant was also awarded a $500 attorney’s fee by our Supreme Court when appellees petitioned for discretionary review of this court’s decision in JSI I. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc. and Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 451 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fitzgerald & Co., Inc. v. Roberts Elec. Contractors, Inc., 533 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
-
Associated Elec. & GAS Ins. Servs., Ltd. v. Ranger Ins. Co., 560 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…cially concurring); American Home Assurance Co.; Canadian Universal Ins. Co. v. Employers Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 325 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 336 So. 2d 1180 (Fla.1976); Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc., 473 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); United States Auto Ass’n v. Hartford Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 476 So. 2d 676 (Fla.1985); American & Foreign Ins. Co. Unlike Canadian Universal, in which Canadian’s wrongful refusal to settle subjec…
Authorities Cited
- Am. & Foreign Ins. Co. v. AVIS Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 401 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- In re ONE 1979 Ford VAN v. Drosis, 443 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)