LLOYD FINLEY TOMPKINS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Credit For Time Served cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from the judgments and sentences imposed after revocation of his probation in two cases consolidated below. We find no merit in his argument concerning the insufficiency of the affidavits of violation of probation filed in either case. Nor do we find any merit in his argument concerning the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the revocations. We therefore affirm.
However, because the record before us is inadequate, we are unable to determine whether there is merit to appellant’s argument that he was not given proper credit for time served. Consequently, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise the issue of credit time in a motion for postconviction relief and establish a sufficient record, if he can.
AFFIRMED.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harrison v. Metro. Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co., 475 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…rage, the restriction involved here is valid because otherwise the family exclusion in the policy would be rendered meaningless. See Reid v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So. 2d 1172 (Fla.1977); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Knight, 473 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). For the same reason plaintiff is not entitled to uninsured motorist coverage on another automobile which was owned by plaintiff, was covered by the same policy, [*1372] and was not involved in the accident. Also, as concluded i…