UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD ALLEN SCHUSTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

11th Cir. | 1983-01-25
No. 81-5478
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
697 F.2d 910 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. Prescott A. Berry, 722 F.2d 443 (9th Cir. 1983)
    …1th Cir.1983) (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)), and to confidences revealed to agents as well as informers, see United States v. Schuster, 684 F. 2d 744, 747-48 (11th Cir.1982), rehearing granted, 697 F. 2d 910 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Scott, 521 F. 2d at 1191. The chief remaining limitation on the “misplaced confidence” doctrine appears to be that the agent or informer may not search for evidence not voluntarily revealed by the unsuspecting crimi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw