STEPHEN S. SLATICK, PETITIONER,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS

11th Cir. | 1983-02-14
No. 81-6157
Before TJOFLAT, FAY and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
698 F.2d 433 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal but had the power to transfer the case to the correct circuit court.


Facts & Procedural History

Stephen Slatick, diagnosed with black lung disease, was advised by the Labor Department to file an appeal in this circuit. After the deadline for fili…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT:

Stephen Slatick was exposed to coal dust within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. He subsequently moved to Florida where he learned that he was suffering from “black lung” disease. He brought a claim for black lung benefits with the Benefits Review Board of the United States Department of Labor. The Benefits Review Board denied Slatick’s claim.

Slatick then sought to appeal this ruling. The Labor Department, in a letter to Slatick on October 23, 1981, advised Slatick that he had 60 days to file an appeal in this court. The Labor Department rendered this advice pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 921(c) (1976), which provides that jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of the Benefits Review Board lies in the “court of appeals for the circuit court where the injury occurred.” Acting on the Labor Department’s advice, Slatick petitioned this court for review. The Labor Department subsequently moved this court to dismiss Slatick’s petition for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that his injury had occurred within the Third Circuit and therefore the court of appeals for that circuit had exclusive jurisdiction. We granted the motion to dismiss.

Slatick now asks us to reconsider our decision, and alternatively asks this court to transfer the case to the Third Circuit if we again hold that we lack jurisdiction to review his petition. We are convinced that we lack jurisdiction to review this petition and therefore adhere to our earlier decision. We hold that we do have the power, however, to transfer this petition to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and therefore grant Slatick’s alternative motion to transfer. In Trans-State Dredging v. Tamer, 695 F. 2d 505 (11th Cir.1982), we noted that the recently enacted Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, Pub.L. No. 97-164, § 301, 50 U.S.L.W. 77, 86 (1982) (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1631) provides specific authority for such a transfer:

Whenever a civil action is filed in a court as defined in section 610 of this title or an appeal, including a petition for review of administrative action, is noticed for or filed with such a court and that court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other such court in which the action or appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or noticed, and the action or appeal shall proceed as if it had been filed in or noticed for the court to which it is transferred on the date upon which it was actually filed in or noticed for the court from which it is transferred.

(emphasis added). Although the effective date of this Act is October 1, 1982, Trans-State held that the Act applies to all cases pending on that date.

Thus, the dispositive question in this case is whether a transfer of Slatick’s petition would be in the interest of justice. We hold that it would be. The Labor Department affirmatively misled Slatick concerning the circuit having jurisdiction to review his petition. Then, after he had followed the Department’s advice and the time for filing a petition in the Third Circuit had expired, the Department claimed that this court lacked jurisdiction and moved for dismissal. A dismissal would operate to bar Slatick’s petition for review in the Third Circuit. To allow this result would certainly not be in the interest of justice. Therefore, pursuant to section 301 of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, we transfer these proceedings to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

SO ORDERED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Squillacote v. United States, 747 F.2d 432 (7th Cir. 1984)
    …to determine first whether a want of jurisdiction exists; second, whether transfer would be in the interest of justice; third, to transfer the action); Slatick v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 698 F. 2d 433, 434 (11th Cir.1983) (“the dispositive question in this case is whether a transfer * * * would be in the interest of justice”). Transfer in the case before us would give the government a second bite at the apple and only result in needless expense…
  • …s proper. Hardesty v. Benefits Review Board, 783 F. 2d 138, 139 (8th Cir.1986) (per curiam); Bernardo v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 772 F. 2d 576 (9th Cir.1985); Slatick v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 698 F. 2d 433, 434 (11th Cir.1983) (order). We now join those circuits. Therefore, as Danko was exposed to coal dust solely in the State of Pennsylvania, the Third Circuit is the proper forum for this appeal.2 When this court determines that we are without juris…
  • …h Circuit where, he alleges, the disease manifested itself. This is not a case of first impression, the Eleventh Circuit having already addressed this “exposure” v. “manifestation of disease” jurisdictional controversy in Slatick v. Director, OWCP, 698 F. 2d 433 (11th Cir.1983). The Petitioner in Slatick was exposed to coal dust in the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania) and, subsequently, moved to the Eleventh Circuit (Florida) where he learned he might be suffering [*578] from black lung disease. His claim for b…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw