IN THE MATTER OF BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL., DEBTOR. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, DEFENDANT, AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT
IN THE MATTER OF BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL., DEBTOR. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, DEFENDANT, AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT
700 F.2d 214
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 36 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment of the District Court, essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. We add, in particular, that we conclude that 28 United States Code §§ 1471(a) and (b) were not invalidated by the Marathon decision,1 but if they were, nevertheless, the jurisdictional grant of 28 United States Code § 1334 remains effective during the transitional period.
AFFIRMED.
. The Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co.,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
White Motor Corp. v. Citibank, 704 F.2d 254 (6th Cir. 1983)
-
In re UNR Indus., Inc., 725 F.2d 1111 (7th Cir. 1984)
-
In re Kaiser v. Kaiser, 722 F.2d 1574 (2d Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- N. Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1982)