ALBERT HAMM, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Albert Hamm, Jr. was charged with violating three conditions of his probation. After a hearing, the trial judge revoked Hamm’s probation and sentenced him to twenty-four months imprisonment. The trial judge entered no written order revoking Hamm’s probation and stating therein which condition or conditions he had violated as contemplated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.790(b).
Because the record on appeal contains no transcript of the probation revocation hearing, we cannot determine whether the evidence at the hearing supported the trial court’s revocation of Hamm’s probation. Therefore, the case is remanded to the trial court for the entry of a written order revoking Hamm’s probation and indicating which condition or conditions of probation were found to have been violated.
RYDER, C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jacobs v. State, 668 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…e was suspended. At the revocation hearing, his probation officer testified that Mr. Jacobs admitted drinking alcoholic beverages; and appellant admitted the driving offense. The hearing transcript is part of the record on appeal. See Hamm v. State, 473 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Mr. Jacobs argues that revocation was not warranted for violations of conditions of probation he characterizes as relatively insignificant. We reject this contention on the facts of this case. We note that alcohol use was impli…