ROLANDO CASTILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
TRACOR MARINE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
ROLANDO CASTILLO, APPELLANT,
TRACOR MARINE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
474 So. 2d 322
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Rolando Castillo appeals from a final order of the trial court denying his motion to assess attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1983), following payment by Crown Life Insurance Co. of Castillo’s claim after the lawsuit was filed and prior to judgment. Because we find that the trial court’s ruling was in error, we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to hold a hearing to determine an appropriate award of attorney’s fees and costs. Wollard v. Lloyd’s and Companies of Lloyd’s, 439 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1983).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Werner v. State, 689 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…e must remand to the Commission to permit it to reconsider the penalty imposed upon appellant in light of this opinion.”); Schepp v. School Bd. of Broward County, 506 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); LaRossa v. Department of Professional Regulation, 474 So. 2d 322, 325 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(“Sinee we have reversed the Commission’s finding with regard to subsection (k), we must remand this cause to the Commission for reconsideration of the penalty imposed.”). Finally, in determining a penalty, both the hearing o…
-
Cottrill v. Dep't OF Ins., 685 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…e must remand to the Commission to permit it to reconsider the penalty imposed upon appellant in light of this opinion.”); Schepp v. School Bd. of Broward County, 506 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); LaRossa v. Department of Professional Regulation, 474 So. 2d 322, 325 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(“Since we have reversed the Commission’s finding with regard to subsection (k), we must remand this cause to the Commission for reconsideration of the penalty imposed.”). Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded. ER…
-
Steven VAN ORE, M.D. v. Bd. OF Med. Exam'rs, 489 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)…22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), the court remanded the cause to the Board of Medical Examiners to enter a new final order after the board had failed to give valid reasons for increasing the recommended penalty. In LaRossa v. Dept. of Professional Regulation, 474 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), the Real Estate Commission accepted the hearing officer’s finding of facts and conclusions of law but increased the recommended penalty from a ninety-day suspension to revocation of the realtor’s license. The appellate court reve…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wollard v. Lloyd's & Cos. OF Lloyd's, 439 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1983)