R.C. HILTON ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
STAN MUSIAL AND BIGGIE'S, INC., SUNCOAST INTERNATIONAL INNS, LTD., EDWARD J. STERN, MARIEMONT INVESTMENT, E.J. STERN, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
R.C. HILTON ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
STAN MUSIAL AND BIGGIE'S, INC., SUNCOAST INTERNATIONAL INNS, LTD., EDWARD J. STERN, MARIEMONT INVESTMENT, E.J. STERN, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
706 F.2d 1171
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1983)
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
R.C. Hilton Associates, Inc. requests a rehearing based on the contention that this court’s treatment of its claim for tortious interference with a business relationship, see 702 F. 2d 907 (11th Cir.1983), is inconsistent with Florida law. In our earlier opinion we did not intend to imply that an enforceable contract between plaintiff and a third party is an essential element of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship. Hilton’s claim fails because he did not establish the existence of an advantageous relationship with Stan Musial and Biggie’s, Inc. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Other
(Opinion April 11, 1983, 11 Cir., 1983, 702 F. 2d 907)
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, Circuit Judge, and PITTMAN *, District Judge.
*
Honorable Virgil Pittman, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.C. Hilton Assocs., Inc. v. Stan Musial & Biggie's Inc., 702 F.2d 907 (11th Cir. 1983)
Authorities Cited
- R.C. Hilton Assocs., Inc. v. Stan Musial & Biggie's Inc., 702 F.2d 907 (11th Cir. 1983)