NADINE M. JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
COLLIER COUNTY, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1985-08-15
No. 66656
BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur., EHRLICH, J., dissents with an opinion in which ADKINS, J., concurs., SHAW, J., dissents with an opinion in which ADKINS, J., concurs.
474 So. 2d 806 Florida Supreme Court (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Second District Court of Appeal in its decision in Johnson v. Collier County, 468 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), certified conflict with Manors of Inverrary XII Condominium Association v. Atreco-Florida, Inc., 438 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), petition dismissed, 450 So. 2d 485 (Fla.1984); Bryan v. State, 438 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Trianon Park Condominium Association v. City of Hialeah, 423 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); and Jones v. City of Longwood, 404 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So. 2d 467 (Fla.1982). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have resolved the conflict in our decision in Trianon Park Condominium Association v. City of Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1985), and we approve the decision of the district court in the instant cause.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur. EHRLICH, J., dissents with an opinion in which ADKINS, J., concurs.

SHAW, J., dissents with an opinion in which ADKINS, J., concurs.

Dissent
EHRLICH, Justice,

EHRLICH, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissent in Trianon.

ADKINS, J., concurs.

Dissent
SHAW, Justice,

SHAW, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissents to Trianon Park Condominium Association v. City of Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1985); Everton v. Willard, 468 So. 2d 936 (Fla.1985); Reddish v. Smith, 468 So. 2d 929 (Fla.1985); and Carter v. City of Stuart, 468 So. 2d 955 (Fla.1985).

ADKINS, J., concurs.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Seguine v. Seguine, 627 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …ental policy] so that the discretionary function exception is inapplicable, there still may be no governmental liability if the public duty doctrine exception is applicable. See Johnson v. Collier County, 468 So. 2d 249, 251 (Fla. 2d DCA), approved, 474 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1985); Wetherington & Pollock, supra, at 35-36. Indeed, it is settled that “a court must find no liability as a matter of law [against a governmental entity] if either (a) no [special tort] duty of care existed [under the public duty doctrine e…

Authorities Cited (11 total)

View all 11 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw