UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL SANCHEZ AND FRANCISCO ARMENDARIS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
SAMUEL SANCHEZ AND FRANCISCO ARMENDARIS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
709 F.2d 1353
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing, insofar as the same is addressed to the panel,1 is DENIED. A review of the record and the briefs, along with statements made by counsel during oral argument, convinces us that it would have been absolutely futile for the appellees to have raised a elaim of duress or coercion in the administrative proceedings.
. Rule 26(F) of our Local Rules provides that, “A suggestion for rehearing en banc will also be treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel.”
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moore v. Balkcom, 716 F.2d 1511 (11th Cir. 1983)…udge McMillan’s Imposition of the Death Sentence In our original panel opinion, we concluded that the sentencing judge committed constitutional error by considering a non-statutory aggravating factor in imposing the death penalty. Moore v. Balkcom, 709 F. 2d 1353, 1361-67 (11th Cir.1983). In doing so, we had not had the opportunity to review the Supreme Court’s holding in Zant v. Stephens,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2733, 77 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983).7 In that case, the Court squarely held that a death sentence imposed und…
-
Pollgreen v. Morris, 770 F.2d 1536 (11th Cir. 1985)…f fines under 8 U.S.C. § 1323. United States v. Blanco, 754 F. 2d 940, 942 (11th Cir.1985) (elements of duress not established by vessel owner); United States v. Sanchez, 520 F.Supp. 1038 (S.D.Fla.1981), aff'd 703 F. 2d 580 (11th Cir.), reh. denied, 709 F. 2d 1353 (11th Cir.1983) (we determined on rehearing in Sanchez that “it would have been absolutely futile for the appellees [vessel owners] to have raised a defense of duress or coercion in the administrative proceedings.”) Although, because of the imprimat…
-
Lyden v. Howerton, 783 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir. 1986)….C. § 1323. Pollgreen v. Morris, 770 F. 2d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Blanco, 754 F. 2d 940 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Sanchez, 520 F.Supp. 1038, 1040-41 (S.D.Fla.1981), aff'd, 703 F. 2d 580, on denial of rehearing, 709 F. 2d 1353, 1353 (11th Cir.1983). The court in Lyden found that duress had been made out as a matter of law from the facts in the administrative record and those adduced in the trial below. The INS, however, had failed to contest any of the evidence adduced…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence