JIMMY LEE JORDAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Freeman v. State, 576 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …fy the voice.” Although the defendant could have been compelled at that point to give a sample of his voice to the jury or suffer an adverse infer [*416] ence from a refusal to do so, Macias v. State, 515 So. 2d 206, 208 (Fla.1987); Larkin v. State, 474 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the prosecution made no such request, the court did not order same, and the prosecuting attorney made no argument to the jury that an adverse inference should be drawn from the defendant’s silence in the face of such a request.…
• West v. State, 912 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …occurred because Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(c) required the state to give “reasonable notice” that he would be required to provide a voice exemplar at trial. We find no discovery violation. This case is controlled by Larkin v. State, 474 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Larkin held that rule 3.220(c) applied to pretrial situations, and not to trial, so that the state was not required “to advise [a defendant] ahead of time that it intends to request a voice identification at trial.” Id. at 1284.…
• Larkin v. State, 488 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …dgment and sentence but reversed the retention of jurisdiction over the first one-third of the sentence and remanded with direction so that defendant could be apprised of the reasons for retention prior to pronouncement of sentence. Larkin v. State, 474 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The defendant now contends each of the five reasons given for retention were legally insufficient; and if any one of the five was such, the retention must be vacated. We are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that even if the…

Authorities Cited

• Jordan v. State, 470 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)