MARJORIE HARRINGTON, ETC., PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT,
v.
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF GARLAND, ETC., DEFENDANT, APPELLEE
MARJORIE HARRINGTON, ETC., PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT,
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF GARLAND, ETC., DEFENDANT, APPELLEE
715 F.2d 1
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1983)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 30 cases
Opinion of the Court
Having reviewed the record and after briefing and argument, we are in full agreement with the district court, 551 F.Supp. 1371, that this action was barred by res judicata. As our reasons for reaching this result are substantially the same as those set forth at length in the district court’s comprehensive memorandum and order, we do not reiterate them here. The fact that another judge had earlier declined to dismiss did not prevent the district court from acting correctly as it did.
Affirmed. Costs for appellee.
Costs in favor of the appellee are taxed at $84.04.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992 (U.S. 1984)
-
Town OF Burlington v. Dep't OF Educ. FOR the Commonwealth OF Mass., 736 F.2d 773 (1st Cir. 1984)
-
David D. v. Dartmouth Sch. Comm., 775 F.2d 411 (1st Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence