MAUREEN HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN B. HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT, APPELLEE
MAUREEN HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN B. HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT, APPELLEE
719 F.2d 1
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the district court, 564 F.Supp. 1146, that the Feres doctrine bars this action. Under the facts, we cannot recognize a duty to follow up because this would mean creating continuous onsets of new causes of action extending beyond the period of active service.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Augustine Andrews, Sr. v. Bechtel Power Corp. & Local 276, 780 F.2d 124 (1st Cir. 1985)
-
Heilman v. United States & United States Dep't of the Navy, 731 F.2d 1104 (3d Cir. 1984)
-
Demars v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 779 F.2d 95 (1st Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence