JOE BENHAM, TERRY E. ANTHONY AND WOODROW BIDDLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
JOE EDWARDS AND JOHN R. BRANNING, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

5th Cir. | 1983-11-03
No. 80-9052
Before RONEY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.
719 F.2d 772 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1983) Negative Treatment
Cited by 32 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The judgment heretofore entered in this case, 678 F. 2d 511, having been vacated by the Supreme Court, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3565, 77 L.Ed.2d 1406, and the case having been remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3043, 77 L.Ed.2d 694 (1983), and the parties’ post-remand briefs having been considered, the case is now REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the decision and opinion of the Supreme Court in Jones v. United States.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (16 total)

Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw