ALBERT LEE REED, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pirino v. Pirino, 549 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …the property apportioned to the wife may be considered in awarding alimony. See Marston v. Marston, 484 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So. 2d 1151 (Fla.1986), Mendonsa v. Mendonsa, 479 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), Murphy v. Murphy, 475 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) and Reback v. Reback, 296 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974) cert. denied, 312 So. 2d 737 (Fla.1975). Additionally, both parties’ earning abilities are among the factors which should be considered in determining the amount of alimony…
• Moore v. Moore, 543 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …find an abuse of discretion by the trial court should we reverse. See Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1986); [*254] Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So. 2d 542 (Fla.1985); Manto v. Manto, 509 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Murphy v. Murphy, 475 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Brown v. Brown, 472 So. 2d 873, 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Marlow v. Marlow, 464 So. 2d 717, 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The trial court has a very broad ambit of discretion in resolving issues raised in dissolution cases. Canaka…
• Carrison v. Carrison, 486 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …l court’s decision as to the marital residence was a reasonable exercise of the court’s discretion in fashioning an overall equitable distribution [*1367] of the marital properties. Fell v. Fell, 421 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Murphy v. Murphy, 475 So. 2d 1253, 1255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Similarly, given the substantially disparate financial positions of the parties, we discern no error in the trial court’s decision to award the wife attorney’s fees and costs, Kissinger v. Mason, 436 So. 2d 1049, 1051 (Fla…