PRASSERT PAOINTHARA, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
PRASSERT PAOINTHARA, PETITIONER,
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
721 F.2d 651
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion is amended as follows:
Delete from opinion dated June 15, 1983, commencing at page 2823, first column, line 4 of slip op., 708 F. 2d 472 at page 474, second column, line 11, the following:
“Only by implication from the silences in this colloquy can it be inferred, if indeed it can be inferred at all, that petitioner, through his counsel, admitted his alienage. While we are aware of the need for dispatch in bringing deportation proceedings to a close, we cannot accept inferences borne only by silence as substantial and probative evidence”
and insert in its stead:
“We hold that counsel’s statements were too ambiguous”
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hernandez-Robledo v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 777 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1985)
-
Berroteran-Melendez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 955 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir. 1992)
-
Gameros-Hernandez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 883 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1989)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Prassert Paointhara v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 708 F.2d 472 (9th Cir. 1983)