ROBINSON ANTONIO MARTI-XIQUES, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT

11th Cir. | 1984-01-27
No. 82-6141
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, FAY and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
724 F.2d 1463 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT:

The petition of Immigration and Naturalization Service for rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion at 713 F. 2d 1511 (11th Cir.1983) is VACATED and the case is assigned to the oral argument calendar and classified as a Class III case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. MacHado, 804 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1986)
    …determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the defendant, or (2) involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. . The original panel opinion in United States v. Rackley, 724 F. 2d 1463 (11th Cir.1984), is superseded by the opinion on rehearing, United States v. Rackley, 742 F. 2d 1266 (11th Cir.1984). . 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) provides: (c) Whoever— (2) carries a firearm unlawfully during the commission of any felony for which he ma…
  • United States v. Rackley, 742 F.2d 1266 (11th Cir. 1984)
    …y instructions were proper with respect to circumstantial evidence. Rackley’s convictions are affirmed; Crosby’s convictions are reversed. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART. . The opinion in this case reported as United States v. Rackley, et al., 724 F. 2d 1463 (11th Cir.1984), is withdrawn and this opinion substituted. The applicable statutes are: 18 U.S.C.A. § 2. (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishab…
  • …road temporarily and those who have not is irrational. The court held that equal protection requires that § 212(c) relief be available in deportation proceedings even where the alien has never left this country. . 713 F. 2d 1511 (11th Cir.1983). . 724 F. 2d 1463 (11th Cir.1984). . See 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2) (1982). . See id., § 1251(a)(13). . 8 U.S.C. §§ 1254(a)(1), 1182(c) (1982). . Phinpathya v. INS, 673 F. 2d 1013, 1017 (9th Cir.1982). . — U.S. at-, 104 S.Ct. at 590, 78 L.Ed.2d at 410 (quoting Jay v.…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw