CARL LAWTON AND MARY LAWTON, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALPINE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLEE
CARL LAWTON AND MARY LAWTON, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
ALPINE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLEE
476 So. 2d 233
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm upon authority of Fisher v. Shenandoah General Construction Co., 472 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and, as was done in Fisher, certify to the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance the following question:
DOES THE FLORIDA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAW PRECLUDE ACTIONS BY EMPLOYEES AGAINST THEIR CORPORATE EMPLOYERS FOR INTENTIONAL TORTS EVEN THOUGH THE INJURIES WERE INCURRED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT?
Affirmed.
ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA, Association Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Prods., Inc., 498 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 1986)…OES THE FLORIDA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAW PRECLUDE ACTIONS BY EMPLOYEES AGAINST THEIR CORPORATE EMPLOYERS FOR INTENTIONAL TORTS EVEN THOUGH THE INJURIES WERE INCURRED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT? Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Products, Inc., 476 So. 2d 233, 233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. The question is identical to that certified in Fisher v. Shenandoah General Construction Co., 498 So. 2d 882 (Fla.1986). In Fisher, although…
Authorities Cited
- Fisher v. Shenandoah Gen. Constr. Co., 472 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)