CURFEW DAVIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER D. ZANT, WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

11th Cir. | 1984-03-06
No. 83-8244
728 F.2d 492 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 34 cases

Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (16 total)

  • Andrews v. State, 536 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
    …s v. Mohabir, 624 F. 2d 1140 (2d Cir.1980, United States v. Rada-Solano, 625 F. 2d 577 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021, 101 S.Ct. 588, 66 L.Ed. 2d 482 (1980), United States v. Suttiswad, 696 F. 2d 645 (9th Cir.1982), United States v. Aleman, 728 F. 2d 492 (11th Cir.1984), and United States v. McAllister, 747 F. 2d 1273 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829, 106 S.Ct. 92, 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985). A Jewell instruction is generally authorized in the federal courts in prosecutions for importation of or…
    1 / 2
  • Dwyer Frank Wetzler v. State, 455 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …rayton because, inter alia, appellant here admitted that the transaction involved was “shady.” The doctrine of “willful blindness” (also called “deliberate ignorance”) is well established in federal criminal law. See, e.g., United States v. Aleman, 728 F. 2d 492 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Del Aguila-Reyes, 722 F. 2d 155 (5th Cir.1983). An extensive discussion of the doctrine and its derivation is contained in United States v. Jewell, 532 F. 2d 697 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 951, 96 S.Ct. 3173…
  • Rodgers v. State, 537 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …ies relied on by the state hold that a jury may properly find the defendant has “knowledge” of the material facts where he has deliberately chosen to remain ignorant. See Wetzler v. State, 455 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); United States v. Aleman, 728 F. 2d 492 (11th Cir. 1984); United States v. Rada-Solano, 625 F. 2d 577 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021, 101 S.Ct. 588, 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Batencort, 592 F. 2d 916 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Murrieta-Bejarano, 552 F. 2d 1323…

Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw