IN RE DIMITRIOUS TSUNIS A/K/A DIMITRIOUS J. TSUNIS AND D.J. TSUNIS, DEBTOR; DIMITRIOUS TSUNIS A/K/A DIMITRIOUS J. TSUNIS AND D.J. TSUNIS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v.

SPANCRETE NORTHEAST INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLEES

2d Cir. | 1984-04-26

Nos. 1130, Docket 84-5010

733 F.2d 27 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1984) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The order of the District Court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in both Bankruptcy Judge Radoyevich’s opinion of April 6, 1983, 29 B.R. 527 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.Y. 1983), and Judge Mishler’s opinion of December 5, 1983, — B.R. - (E.D.N.Y. 1983).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

In re Persky v. Persky, 893 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

IN RE DIMITRIOUS TSUNIS A/K/A DIMITRIOUS J. TSUNIS AND D.J. TSUNIS, DEBTOR; DIMITRIOUS TSUNIS A/K/A DIMITRIOUS J. TSUNIS AND D.J. TSUNIS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. SPANCRETE NORTHEAST INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLEES

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

IN RE DIMITRIOUS TSUNIS A/K/A DIMITRIOUS J. TSUNIS AND D.J. TSUNIS, DEBTOR; DIMITRIOUS TSUNIS A/K/A DIMITRIOUS J. TSUNIS AND D.J. TSUNIS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v.

SPANCRETE NORTHEAST INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLEES