UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
733 F.2d 78
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1984)
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgment of the district court that the Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Act is facially constitutional, 727 F. 2d 1475.
The court did not determine whether the Act is constitutional as applied in any specific instance.
The case is remanded to the district court with directions to permit the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to raise any issues not determined by the March 14, 1984 decision of the court sitting en banc.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hicks v. The Gates Rubber Co., 833 F.2d 1406 (10th Cir. 1987)
-
United States v. Maez, 872 F.2d 1444 (10th Cir. 1989)
-
United States v. Fountain, 776 F.2d 878 (10th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United Farm Workers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Ariz. Agric. Emp. Relations Bd., 727 F.2d 1475 (9th Cir. 1984)